Matir Asurim, Tzedek Chicago, and Yom Kippur

As a member of Tzedek Chicago who is active with Matir Asurim: The Jewish Care Network for Incarcerated People, I was asked to share about this work as part of Tzedek’s Yom Kippur afternoon studies. Below here are my remarks, more or less, from October 12 (Yom Kippur 5785); associated slides are here.

Presentation title page: “Matir Asurim: Introduction to the Jewish Care Network for Incarcerated People,” Yom Kippur 5785 — Virginia Avniel Spatz. + Tzedek Chicago logo

Some of us have been worshiping together for much of the day. Others may be joining from another context. Either way, I hope this hour will bring focus to one way we can engage in teshuvah/repair for the coming year. The basic concept for this session is that I was asked to share a little about my volunteer work with the organization, Matir Asurim: The Jewish Care Network for Incarcerated People, and bring some text to link that work with Yom Kippur.

Overview, Basics, and Contacts

[SLIDE 2]. The planned shape of the session is:

  • Basics and contact information for myself and the organization Matir Asurim
  • Text exploration: Genesis 44
  • Matir Asurim Guiding Principles
  • Back to Genesis 44
  • Thoughts for Yom Kippur and into 5785

So, let’s get started with some basics

[SLIDE 3] Matir Asurim — “One Who Frees Captives”

Who We Are: “We are a collection of Chaplains, Rabbis, Cantors, Kohanot/Hebrew Priestesses, advocates, activists, volunteers, loved ones of incarcerated people, and people with direct experience of incarceration. We are an all volunteer group who began meeting in 2021. We live and work across Turtle Island, in territories, cities, and rural settings of the US and Canada.”

I’ve been volunteering with Matir Asurim for close to two years,

  • producing the monthly e-newsletter,
  • serving as a penpal/chevruta partner with an incarcerated Jew,
  • helping to create resources for readers who are incarcerated,
  • helping craft materials for outside readers around incarceration,
  • producing some additional programming,
  • and working on organizational infrastructure.

We’ll get into some more specifics a bit later. Meanwhile, some contacts:

Matir Asurim link in bioFacebookInstagram — matirasurimnetwork@gmail.com

TzedekChicago linkTreeFacebookInstagram

See also vspatz.net

Now let’s turn to some Torah text.

Joseph, Judah, and Siblings in Genesis

[SLIDE 4] Joseph and His Siblings

[Summary] Joseph is 12th of 13 siblings in the family of Jacob, Rachel, Leah, Bilhah, and Zilpah. In his youth, he was the favorite of his father, Jacob, and an annoyance to the rest of the family. So, Joseph’s brothers attempt to get rid of him. Their scheming takes an odd turn, however, and, although his family does not know it, Joseph becomes a powerful government leader in Mitzrayim, second in command to Pharaoh.

When famine strikes in Canaan, Jacob sends the brothers down to Mitzrayim, where grain is plentiful, to beg food. Joseph, still unrecognized by his brothers, treats the brothers to a feast at the palace and grants the requested supplies.

Joseph also orchestrates a criminal charge against the youngest brother – thus creating a situation in which the older siblings can again harm a younger brother, or they can act to avoid such harm.

Genesis 44 starts as the brothers leave the palace with the supplies.

[SLIDE 5] Genesis 44 Revised (2023) Jewish Publication Society translation, via Sefaria

1) Then he [Joseph] instructed his house steward as follows, “Fill the men’s bags with food, as much as they can carry, and put each one’s money in the mouth of his bag.

2) Put my silver goblet in the mouth of the bag of the youngest one, together with his money for the rations.” And he did as Joseph told him.

3) With the first light of morning, the men were sent off with their pack animals.

4) They had just left the city and had not gone far, when Joseph said to his house steward, “Up, go after those men! And when you overtake them, say to them, ‘Why did you repay good with evil?”…

[The house steward follows Joseph’s orders, going after the brothers and accusing them of stealing the goblet.]

12) He searched, beginning with the oldest and ending with the youngest; and the goblet turned up in Benjamin’s bag.

13) At this they rent their clothes. Each reloaded his pack animal, and they returned to the city.

[SLIDE 6] (Genesis 44 cont.)

14) When Judah and his brothers reentered the house of Joseph, who was still there, they threw themselves on the ground before him.

15) Joseph said to them, “What is this deed that you have done? Do you not know that a man like me practices divination?”

16) Judah replied, “What can we say to my lord? How can we plead, how can we prove our innocence? God has uncovered the crime of your servants. Here we are, then, slaves of my lord, the rest of us as much as the one in whose possession the goblet was found.”

17) But [Joseph] replied, “Far be it from me to act thus! Only the man in whose possession the goblet was found shall be my slave; the rest of you go back in peace to your father.”

18) Then Judah went up to him and said, “Please, my lord, let your servant appeal to my lord, and do not be impatient with your servant, you who are the equal of Pharaoh. [Link to bilingual English/Hebrew at Mechon-Mamre]

וַיִּגַּשׁ אֵלָיו יְהוּדָה, וַיֹּאמֶר בִּי אֲדֹנִי, יְדַבֶּר-נָא עַבְדְּךָ דָבָר בְּאָזְנֵי אֲדֹנִי, וְאַל-יִחַר אַפְּךָ בְּעַבְדֶּךָ: כִּי כָמוֹךָ, כְּפַרְעֹה

For the last verse, here, I want to look at a few words in Hebrew.

[SLIDE 7] Here’s Genesis 44:18 again in the Everett Fox (Schocken 1995) translation —

Yehuda came closer to him and said:

וַיִּגַּשׁ אֵלָיו יְהוּדָה וַיֹּאמֶר

Please, my lord,

בִּי אֲדֹנִי

pray let your servant speak a word in the ears of my lord,

יְדַבֶּר־נָא עַבְדְּךָ דָבָר בְּאׇזְנֵי אֲדֹנִי

and do not let your anger flare up against your servant,

וְאַל־יִחַר אַפְּךָ בְּעַבְדֶּךָ

for you are like Pharaoh!

כִּי כָמוֹךָ כְּפַרְעֹה׃

va’yigash eilav…

This expression, va’yigash eilavis, is worth considering. It comes up in midrash about this Torah story and it appears in Maimonides vocabulary discussion.

Jewish Teachers Discuss “Approaching”

[SLIDE 8] This is a small portion from Maimonides Guide for the Perplexed. Part 1 has many chapters focusing on Hebrew vocabulary.

BTW, I highly recommend checking out Maimonides’ vocabulary chapters, if you can. Sefaria offers free bilingual text with live links to the Tanakh verses mentioned, and I find it a worthwhile exercise to spend some time with the words Maimonides discusses.

Part 1, Chapter 18 is about three similar words: Karov, Naga, and Nagash

קרוב – נגוע – נגוש

Maimonides writes:

“THE three words karab, “to come near,” naga‘, “to touch,” and nagash, “to approach,” sometimes signify “contact” or “nearness in space,” sometimes the approach of man’s knowledge to an object, as if it resembled the physical approach of one body to another.”

He gives examples of each usage, including Gen 44:18: “…And Judah drew near (va-yiggash) unto him”

While we pursue the exchange between Judah and Joseph, it’s worth keeping this expression and the Hebrew vocabulary in mind, more generally: What does it mean to be near to another person in terms of physical space and knowledge of another?

A number of teachers over the centuries have derived lessons from Genesis 44:18. Here are two…

[SLIDE 9] va’yigash eilav yehudah…

It is asked: Judah and Joseph are already in the same room. So, why does the text tell us that Judah vayigash, “drew near” or “came in contact”?

One answer: Jacob ben Asher says:

The last letters of these three words — vayigaSH eilaV yehudaH, shin-vav-hey — spell “shaveh, שָׁוֶה [equal].” Judah’s step forward changes the dynamic, allowing the brothers to speak directly, as equals.

Another answer: The 18th Century teacher, Or Hachayim, from Morocco, cites Prov 27:19: “As face answers to face in water, So does one person’s heart to another”

Building on his teaching, we can see Judah’s step forward as an attempt to create a face-to-face encounter. This was a struggle for Judah, to step across apparent cultural differences and the gap in their positions. The result, ultimately, was reconciliation between the brothers.

This principle of seeking face-to-face interaction can be useful for the season of teshuvah to consider when taking steps in interpersonal reconciliation.

It is also a guiding principle for Matir Asurim as an organization.

Matir Asurim Guiding Concepts

[SLIDE 10] Panim-el-Panim, seeking face-to-face approach, is a guiding principle of Matir Asurim: “Seeking ‘face-to-face’ interactions, despite difference, distance and bars; approaching one another as equals and striving to work in genuine relationship.”

This shapes our penpal relationships, our creation of resources for those who are behind bars, as well as any advocacy on legislation or change of practices, regulations, and conditions inside.

Matir Asurim seeks to provide resources that reflect realities in carceral facilities which often include circumstances that contradict assumptions in much Jewish teaching

  • reciting prayers or reading Torah right next to toilets;
  • reciting daily prayers upon waking, which might not align with shacharit, morning prayers, at all;
  • figuring out how to create community in isolation, when so much of Jewish life assumes access to community (not exclusively an incarceration issue, but a BIG challenge for Jew who are incarcerated)

There are enormous challenges to organizing across bars, and we know that people inside are counting on those of us on the outside to organize and advocate where they cannot.

Still, it’s crucial to take our lead from incarcerated people and those who have experienced incarceration.

More on this guiding principle and its sources at Matir Asurim’s webpage. See also more thoughts: “Judah Approached.”

Matir Asurim has five other guiding principles

[SLIDE 11] Matir Asurim Guiding concepts

This is a shortened version; visit site for fuller presentation

B’tzelem Elohim [divine image]:

All people are created in the image of the Divine.

We all carry a spark of divine goodness as well as the capacity for creative action and transformation.

Teshuva [repentance/return]:

We believe in human resilience and transformation, in our ability to make amends after experiencing and/or perpetrating harm.

We practice this relationally as conflict arises within our organizing, and also strive to create a world that uplifts restorative accountability processes rather than punishment.

Refua Shleima [Complete Healing]:

We work towards collective healing and wholeness, striving to restore balanced relationships within the broader interconnected web of creation and to heal the traumatic effects of white supremacy, colonization, and other systems of oppression that affect our minds and bodies.

Learning from every person:

Learning from every person requires honoring the contributions and voices of people who have been systemically silenced, including through incarceration. In our conversations, we strive to hold awareness around differences in identity and power dynamics.

Kol Yisrael Aravim Zeh Bazeh

[All Jews Are Responsible, One to the Other]/Communal Responsibility:

“All Yisrael is responsible, one for the other.” Jews have many universalist obligations, but we also have a special duty to other Jews.

A little more on this last principle —

[SLIDE 12] Kol Yisrael Aravim Zeh Bazeh

Matir Asurim works with non-Jewish individuals and organizations on issues, trying to address needs of folks who are incarcerated and returning from incarceration in both the US and Canada.

Many non-Jewish groups are larger and better equipped to cope with more general issues, such as solitary confinement and the death penalty. We are also trying to link up with other affected groups regarding what is often called “religious diet.”

But we also focus on specifically Jewish needs: Trying to ensure that incarcerated Jews and those exploring Judaism have access to penpals and spiritual resources. In some carceral facilities, Jews are still offered a Christian bible and told to “ignore the end.” Trying to supply more appropriate resources is one goal. We also seek to fill requests for obtaining a tallit or tefillin – often an issue for those who are not recognized by Aleph (the biggest Jewish organization working in prisons, which provides resources for some Jews but not all).

[SLIDE 13] At a more basic level, we seek to increase awareness in Jewish communities that Jews DO experience incarceration and that we cannot treat incarceration as something that happens to other people.

This awareness also leads, in turn, to more general concerns about incarceration and the toll it takes on individuals, families, and society….

And that takes us back to Maimonides’ idea that “coming near” can be a matter of knowledge as much as one of physical nearness.

Back to “Coming Near”

[SLIDE 14] Back to Genesis 44

[Summary] Judah approaches Joseph and relates the brothers’ previous visit to Mitzrayim for food rations, when Joseph insisted that they return with their youngest brother. Judah includes in his tale the fiction, from years earlier, of a brother killed by a beast and their father’s real grief over the loss. Judah says that incarcerating Benjamin would increase Jacob’s pain and so offers himself as captive instead. At this point, Joseph can no longer restrain himself, clears the room of everyone except his brothers, weeps loudly, and reveals himself.

Gen 45:4-5 – Fox (Schocken) translation:

Then Yosef said to his brothers: I am Yosef. Is my father still alive?

But his brothers were not able to answer him,

for they were terrified before him.

Yosef said to his brothers:

Pray come close to me! [geshu-na eilai גְּשׁוּ־נָא אֵלַי]

They came close. [va’yigashu וַיִּגָּשׁוּ]

He said: I am Yosef your brother, whom you sold into Egypt.

This time, the same verb, nagash, that we saw in Gen 44:18 is used by Joseph to invite approach, and the brother comply. Joseph invites the brothers to hear a truth they previously did not know even though they did know they had a part in causing harm.

In the Torah, Joseph will go on to explain that it’s all good, because even though the brothers meant ill, God meant to put Joseph where he ends up. Still we can consider this verse and what it means for the brothers to hear from Joseph about his direct experience. They come close and learn something they did not know but MUST if they are to understand Joseph’s life and their own roles in the wider world which also includes incarceration as a regular part of its function.

There are ways we all can learn more about the role incarceration plays in our history and our society now and how it impacts individuals and families.

  • We can opt to get closer to individuals who are or have been incarcerated.
  • We can also opt to approach through general learning.

[SLIDE 15] They came close: approaching as a matter of knowledge

  • Explore the complex, interrelated stories of racism, enslavement, and incarceration; of colonialism, displacement and destruction
  • Learn about the over-representation of Indigenous people in US and Canadian carceral systems
  • Learn about the Incentive System in the Canadian carceral system
  • Learn about the Exception Clause in the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution
  • Learn about the “Auburn system” of incarceration, which predates the US Civil War and the 13th Amendment. We have a video and transcript coming soon about Freeman’s Challenge — and I recommend the book….

One of the things that Robin Bernstein, author of Freeman’s Challenge, says she was trying to do with her book is to stop letting the North off the hook in terms of responsibility for our carceral state. Many of us associate exploiting prisoners for profit with the US South and Reconstruction. But her book describes a prison for profit system that pre-dates the Civil War and originates in the North….

For me, learning about the Auburn system, which originated in upstate New York, was a real shift in my thinking. So, coming on that verse, Gen 45:5 — where Joseph says, “I am the one you sold into imprisonment,” really rings new.

More details on some of the topics above, and some related Jewish texts, are available on Matir Asurim’s Resources page — originally prepared for Passover, but also more widely applicable. For more on Freman’s Challenge, visit this page.

In closing, I want to look back at Gen 44 again.

[SLIDE 16]

Returning to Genesis 44:16 Fox (Schocken) translation

Yehuda said: וַיֹּאמֶר יְהוּדָה

What can we say to my lord? מַה־נֹּאמַר לַאדֹנִי

What can we speak, מַה־נְּדַבֵּר

by what can we show ourselves innocent? וּמַה־נִּצְטַדָּק

God has found out your servants’ crime! הָאֱלֹהִים מָצָא אֶת־עֲוֺן עֲבָדֶיךָ

Here we are, servants to my lord, הִנֶּנּוּ עֲבָדִים לַאדֹנִי

so we, גַּם־אֲנַחְנוּ

so the one in whose hand the goblet was found. גַּם אֲשֶׁר־נִמְצָא הַגָּבִיעַ בְּיָדוֹ

[SLIDE 17] When Joseph orchestrates the threatened punishment of Benjamin alone, Judah says “God has found out your servants’ crime!” – ha-elohim, matza et-avon avdeikha

He then repeats the same verb, to find [mem-tzadei-aleph], and offers this poetic statement of collective responsibility:

…so we,

so the one in whose hand the goblet was found,

gam anachnu, גַּם־אֲנַחְנוּ

gam asher-nimtza hagabi’a b’yado, גַּם אֲשֶׁר־נִמְצָא הַגָּבִיעַ בְּיָדוֹ

Many teachers note that Judah seems to be acknowledging the brothers’ long-ago crime. And that verb, mem-tzadei-aleph, finding, might point us to things we might find we are complicit in, like living in a carceral state that relies on ideas of “public safety” leading to people being locked up and tortured.

Judah’s statement — “so we, so the one in whose hand the goblet was found” or “the rest of us as much as he in whose possession the goblet was found” points to an understanding of collective responsibility not unlike what we recite throughout Yom Kippur — when one of us commits a crime, we, all of us, who permitted the conditions that lead to crime, are the ones who sinned.

Gam Anachnu…. Also we…

Mikeitz: Great Source(s)

In one of her essays on the portion Mikeitz, “Then Let Me Bear the Blame For Ever,” Nehama Leibowitz* focuses in on Judah’s words to Jacob, as he prepares to bring Benjamin to Egypt (Genesis/Breishit 43:9):

“If I bring him not unto thee… then let me bear the blame forever.”

The Italian Jewish commentator Elijah Benamozegh (1822-1900), Leibowitz says, “derives a profoundly significant message” from this turn of phrase:

This figure of speech contains a valuable lesson, teaching us something not otherwise explicitly alluded to, in the Torah: that there is no punishment outside of the sin. Sin itself is its own punishment in the Divine scheme of judgement and serves the purpose of reward and punishment. This is the meaning of: “Then shall I bear the blame to my father forever” (44, 32) — (Em Lamikra)

Em Lamikra, “Matrix of Sculpture,” is Benamozegh‘s mid-19th Century commentary on the Torah. (There is also an article about Benamozegh in the Jewish Encyclopedia.)

*For more on Leibowitz, see Source Materials.

The “Opening the Book” series was originally presented in cooperation with the independent, cross-community Jewish Study Center and with Kol Isha, an open group that for many years pursued spirituality from a woman’s perspective at Temple Micah (Reform). “A Song Every Day” is an independent blog, however, and all views, mistakes, etc. are the author’s.

Vayeishev: A Path to Follow

Chapter 38 of Genesis/Breishit — the story of Judah and his daughter-in-law Tamar — is sometimes ignored in the story of Joseph or considered an interruption that, at best, heightens the tension of the “main” story line. But there are important parallels thematically:

The other function of this story seems to be to carry out the major theme of Genesis as we have presented it: continuity and discontinuity between the generations. What is at stake here is not merely the line of one of the brothers, but the line which (as the biblical audience must have been fully aware) will lead to royalty — King David was a descendant of Peretz of v.29. This should not be surprising in a book of origins…

The narrator has woven Chaps. 38 and 37 together with great skill. Again a man is asked to “recognize” objects, again the use of a kid, and again a brother (this time a dead one) is betrayed.
— Fox*

Compare verses 38:24-26 — in which Tamar sends Judah’s pledge to him and asks him to “recognize, please” [ha-ker na] the items — with the brothers asking Jacob to “recognize, please” [ha-ker na] Joseph’s torn and bloodied tunic. (37:31-34).

Also consider links of this story with others relating to ancestors of King David and the messianic line — see, particularly, Lot’s daughters (Genesis/Breishit 19:30-37) and the Book of Ruth.

It is interesting to explore the role of women in these stories. One resource for the Tamar story is “The Harlot as Heroine” by Phyllis Bird in Women in the Hebrew Bible.* This same volume, edited by Alice Bach, offers other essays on women and sexual politics in the bible, including several on the Book of Ruth. (See also notes here on Va-yera and Balak.)

* Please see Source Materials for full citations and more notes.

The “Opening the Book” series was originally presented in cooperation with the independent, cross-community Jewish Study Center and with Kol Isha, an open group that for many years pursued spirituality from a woman’s perspective at Temple Micah (Reform). “A Song Every Day” is an independent blog, however, and all views, mistakes, etc. are the author’s.